Built for pharma & biotech QA teams
Four reviewer personas read every SOP from their own failure mode. Iterate to audit-ready, then export tracked-changes .docx straight into your QMS. Knowledge silo learns your house style as you go.
Section 4 · Cleaning procedure
Findings · 4
All 11 reviewedFix
Inspector · QA · Operator · Trainer
vs. one QA Manager covering all four
Draft → review → revise
vs. one-shot AI prompts
Knowledge silo learns your house
vs. starting from zero each SOP
Azure · Sweden Central
vs. wherever your AI vendor put it
Sound familiar?
Word and a checklist is what you have today. It doesn't scale past one quality manager.
Four reviewer personas — Inspector, QA manager, operator, trainer — read every SOP from their own failure mode in parallel. The bottleneck stops being one person's calendar.
Compliance platforms tell you what to review and when. They don't help you do the review.
Adem reads the procedure with you. Each finding is line-level and actionable — accept, reject, edit. Then export tracked-changes DOCX straight into the QMS you already have.
Generic AI gives you a smart reader. No audit trail, no version history, no house style.
Every iteration, every finding, every decision lands in an append-only audit log. Your terminology, your standards, your prior decisions get captured — so the next review starts from what you already know, not from zero.
How it works
SOP-MFG-001.docx
Drop or click to upload
Paste an existing SOP, upload a DOCX, or pick from 28 presets across operations, QA, training, and safety. You start from something already shaped the way your auditor expects.
Inspector, QA manager, operator, trainer — each reads the SOP from their own angle. Triage the findings inline, regenerate, run the panel again. Real iteration history, not a one-shot prompt.
SOP-MFG-001-v2.docx
42 KB · Ready
Save explicit "this is the approved version" checkpoints. Export with redlines and paste into your QMS. The audit trail records every action — author, action, timestamp — and survives long after the review is over.
Why Adem
Not
Word + a checklist
The most common SOP review process today. Works — until you scale past one quality manager. Adem reads every SOP from four angles in parallel, so the bottleneck stops being one person's calendar.
Not
Compliance platforms
Greenlight, Qualio, MasterControl tell you what to review and remind you when. They don't read the SOP with you. Adem does the actual review — line-level findings, tracked changes, ready to land in whatever QMS you already have.
Not
Veeva-class eQMS
No implementation partner, no contract, no months of onboarding. Sign up, paste a SOP, export a DOCX with redlines — all before lunch. The architecture that grows into an eQMS is there; you don't pay for it until you need it.
Built like a system of record
We're not ISO 27001 certified yet — and we'll tell you that to your face. The architecture was built to those controls from day one, and the security posture is documented and open to design partners.
EU-hosted
Microsoft Azure · Frankfurt available on request.
Encrypted at rest
AES-256-GCM application-layer on top of provider disk encryption.
Tenant isolation
Enforced at the database schema layer, not just in application code.
GDPR Art. 17
One-click account deletion. Audit trail preserved; identifying data scrubbed.
Append-only audit
Database-enforced. 10-year default retention. Exportable for inspectors.
Zero-data-retention APIs
OpenAI / Anthropic enterprise endpoints. Document content is seen only during the active request, never retained, never used to train a model.
Currently onboarding a select cohort of design partners through August 2026. Tell us about your team and your SOP workload — we'll reply within a working day.